The Implications of Bad Research for Health Policy

No US Government organization (that I know of) openly encouraged discontinuation of MMR vaccinations for children in wake of the study linking it to autism. But what if they had? John McCain bought into the claim. As did Oprah Winfrey and Jenny McCarthy (who somehow became an authority despite basing her claim on seeing her child’s soul leave after he got the vaccine). This idiocy prompted actress Amanda Peet to join the opposing team and become a spokesperson for “Vaccinate Your Baby.”

But celebrities (and even politicians) buy into fake science all the time. So far we have been, for the most part, okay, right? The problem with this vaccine claim is that something called “herd immunity” exists. A lot of diseases have only been eradicated because of vaccinations and would be back, with force, if the community’s immunity falls. Essentially, the way herd immunity works is if a vast majority of people are vaccinated, the remainder will be protected from the disease by default. That is why certain religious groups can be safely excluded from vaccination requirements. They make up such a small portion of the population that our health isn’t compromised by their religion. (Here is the math on that.) However, the plethora of individuals refusing vaccines due to fake science are jeopardizing the rest of us.

Luckily, the UK government’s actions have led to the retraction of these initial claims. Hopefully, the negative image of vaccinations will fade quickly and we can all forget the decade where we almost all died because people didn’t want to get a shot. But what if this hadn’t happened? What if vaccination rates continued to fall? What would have been the right public policy move?

Advertisements

About Sylvia Fredericks

Second-Year MPA student at the La Follette School for Public Affairs (University of Wisconsin - Madison)
This entry was posted in Ethics, Health, International, National, News, Politics, Research and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Implications of Bad Research for Health Policy

  1. rmcatee says:

    It is pretty shocking how little of the healthcare provided in the US is actually based on REAL evidence. Studies have found that only a little over 50% of people receive the actual recommended treatments for their ailments.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s